Tuesday, June 2, 2009

How Do Men Get Diverticulitis



One of the many problems facing the national program for social interest housing (VIS), besides the actual construction of the whole (lot, utilities, materials, organization, outsourcing, etc.) what is the financing of the balance remaining after applying the subsidy to housing values.

Taking a typical case, a VIS is priced at 35 million pesos, of which 10 are absorbed by the Government, and 25 million left by the buyer. But most needy families do not qualify for a loan for that amount, the bank does not see in the VIS to warrant an asset because there is no secondary market that claim, and I fear that few families have the economic strength, the income security and discipline to honor him. Unemployment insurance does not point to this need, as subjects are mostly families living in the informal sector.

Knowing these difficulties, the Government recognizes five percentage points in interest rate for seven years for the purchase of new housing up to 167 million, that as far as understood, also houses the VIS (the higher value of the home less reduction in the rate), and some banks to hold eight more, for a total of fifteen .

far so good. Is expected to stimulate demand for housing in middle and lower strata, and thus the construction, employment and the economy. It turns out that the sale of finished housing carries a huge financial risk that builders will not want to assume even greater in the case of towns that include churches, schools and clinics, among others, as the inventory always valued as capital does in motion less in the case of VIS.

The latest housing construction boom of high economic, sold in flats, and was not leveraged by banks (non-plan provides the buyer) if not for those purchasers who took the risk and provided capital. The timing of the start of work coincided with the signing of sale contracts that would ensure breakeven (zero profit, zero losses) and the arrears were covered with builder's capital or small bridge loans.

However this scheme is impossible to take in the construction of lower strata, and the financial risk of building on studies demand is very high. To reduce it, the property would be sold on planes, but in the case of the VIS, government outlays are not sufficient to reach equilibrium. To this we must add that the selection of applicants is done by reverse economic merits (most needed first.)

So for this program to be developed quickly and successfully, we must devise a system of leasing rate housing credit, which reduces legal costs of returns, the buyer granted on planes, and formulas for risk coverage involving probabilistic elements: for example, assurance of compliance with the obligation associated with living, unemployment and when applicable, paid by the government not to charge the monthly payment of credit obligations.

Yances By Miguel Peña. Columnist for El Universal of Cartagena.
myances@msn.com

Monday, June 1, 2009

Marijuana Throat Cancer

A tyrant Urge a fool

says José Obdulio Gaviria that "while Bolivar oozes greatness in their opponents emerge intellectual poverty of ambition. That suspect of his intention of usurping tyrant! "

More than suspicions, the slope of Bolivar to tyranny could be established in several episodes of political life del Libertador. For example, throughout the letter, José Obdulio Gaviria avoids mentioning the Bolivian Constitution, 1826. And avoid it has its rationale: sweeping the defense that makes the former consultant to the political intentions of Simón Bolívar.

To begin it is worth remembering some excerpts of the speech
Libertador to the Constituent Congress of Bolivia:

"The President is to be in our Constitution, like the sun , firm in its center, gives life to the universe. This supreme authority must be perpetual . (...) Give me a fixed point, said one former; and I will move the world. For Bolivia, this point is the president for life.

is that tyranny, in the sense that he was given the term in ancient Greece, was the regime of absolute power, usually one-person, often enacting the tyrant, usually due to popular support. In this regard, the Policy , Aristotle says that "the monarchy or should have only the name without any, or necessarily exists due to the great superiority of that queen, so that tyranny, that is the worst regime is the farthest from a constitution. "

Neither more nor less: Bolivar welcomes the tyrannical intentions of the Bolivian Constitution and even delves into the mess of a particular form of monarchical government in Bolivia, which according to his courtiers, would become the Empire of the Andes, with Bolívar as emperor:

Being

inheritance that perpetuates the monarchy, and almost general in the world: how much more useful is the method I have proposed for the succession of Vice? (...) Consider legislators, who meet these great advantages in life, and Vice President hereditary.

So, the Liberator not only pays tribute to the life presidency and vice hereditary, but practically encouraged lawmakers to keep the figure of tyranny and as healthy for the country. Then

Gaviria says "the message to the convention of Ocana (February 1828), for example, simply unmatched in the pen of some of the founders of America."

What is not former presidential adviser says is what happened after the dissolution of the Convention of Ocaña, Bolívar issued when the Organic Act
August 27 1828, which would provide constitutional law of the state until 1830. Basically what it does is replace Bolívar a constitution with a decree and not reached a consensus in the Convention, receives a liberator or powers that no Democrat could accept as a sole proprietorship is the enactment of a mock constitution.

The Organic Act, the Liberator states that "the people (...) I was in charge of the supreme magistracy. After careful and due deliberation I have decided to take charge, as from today I'm in charge, the supreme power of the Republic, that I will names Liberator, President, that I have given the laws and public votes. "

Within the powers awarded the Simon Bolivar is "name for all uses of the Republic, and remove or relieve or employees when appropriate; issue the necessary decrees and regulations any nature whatsoever, and alter, amend or repeal laws established. "

the end of the Organic Act, Bolivar particular tyranny over citizens:
"The duties of Colombians live under the government and comply with laws, decrees, regulations and instructions of the supreme power "...

If the Liberator was the supreme power, governing, legislating and exercising the superiority which gave the submission that he had entered in the constitutional travesty, no slips doubt tyrannical in which incurred.

trying to justify the tyrannical actions of Bolivar, Jose Obdulio Gaviria is making room for excuse from some totalitarian pretensions of the popular will. Certainly you can be homeless intellectual but not ungrateful, because if Uribe incurs the temptation, go down in history as one of the best presidents, but as one of the tyrants Bolivarian ... What ingratitude!

By Jaime Restrepo. Director of Atrabilioso.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Pasong Tamo Male Waxing

alliance between Latin American rural producers

field producers in Latin America are under attack. The attacks are manifested in different ways, but share the same origin: the XXI Century Socialism and its allies, gathered around the Forum of Sao Paulo.

In Venezuela, farmers are victims of four strokes: price controls, forcing them to sell their products below production cost, the Colombian guerrillas to extortion and kidnapping to producers, with the approval of government of Chavez, an ally of the FARC, the invasions of the most productive lands, sponsored by the party of government, and legal uncertainty, since the Chavez seeks to end private property, either through expropriation, or through ignorance of titles.

In Brazil, the Landless Workers Movement invades lands and farms, with the support of the Workers' Party (PT) and the so-called "liberation theology." While Lula said to respect property, Joao Pedro Stedile, leader of the Landless, acts with impunity in Brazil, with support from the authorities.

In Argentina, the disproportionate increase in the retention (Export duties) and bans the export of certain products, drown producers, particularly smaller ones, although the Kirchner government boasts of defending the poor.

In Bolivia, the land is threatened by the new Constitution (CPE) and a collectivist agrarian reform Marxist who, together with a racist, stripped almost to the owners of white or mestizo of land, not belonging to "original peoples." In addition, the promulgation of decrees and resolutions, as the Supreme Decree No.29480, ban certain exports and stifle the producer.

In the other Latin American nations, rural producers face similar threats and attacks, but the goal is the same: destroy the private agricultural sector and replaced by cooperatives and revolutionary Marxists, dependent on the ruling.

So far, the sectors of the field trying to fend off attacks exclusively within the national territory, without realizing that this is a regional crackdown that has the same origin and the same actors.

If the farmers of Latin America came together to discuss its merits, would find that the actions against them are almost identical, allowing them to design a successful strategy continental defense, against an enemy who is also a continental.

By Alejandro Peña Flood. Atrabilioso columnist.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Alpine Subwoofer Diagram

New subversive threats against the XXI century socialism

The Chavez regime has entered a critical phase of extreme paranoia in detecting enemies everywhere.

In the past identified as potential threats, calls attention to a child who visited us for years in the Sahara desert and eagerly sought to protect the only flower that existed on your planet. No more, no less! The Prince has been mentioned by Chavez as an enemy of the revolution as has happened also to Don Quixote and many other characters that really matter.

I wanted to become Sherlock Holmes to find the tracks of the insurgent activities of The Prince. In so many beautiful words spoken by the character during their stay on earth, dug carefully to see if you suddenly discover the evidence could have led to revolutionary Chavez and his minions, to banish the little visitor.

would have something to do with the vanity of the landlord (the tenant is a thing of the past) in Miraflores? I do not know. But it may raise suspicions of "counterrevolutionary" activity and "imperialist" Case The Prince issued on the subject: "vain For all other men are admirers."

Nothing more perverse for the Bolivarian revolution that someone can accommodate this sentence to Hugo Chávez Frías. That filling buses for the subject to attend the demonstrations and shouting speeches in favor of socialism in the XXI century, but especially for the great leader of the revolution, can be interpreted as an act of vanity.

Will The Little Prince anticipated the Venezuelan caudillo? Could it be that Chavez and his exile to recognize the child, which effectively is just a vain tyrant who sees Venezuelans as fans?

Is there evidence that could serve to answer these questions positively. Those who are not fans of Chavez and his project, they lost their broadcasting licenses, are persecuted, their property raided and some even end up as refugees in other countries. Anyone who dares to play a different role to the respective admiration and adulation, lost honor, liberty and property on behalf of the futility of socialism promoted by Chavez.

All this would seem sufficient, at the Chavez paranoia, to banish the interplanetary traveler. But no. I think you need more, at least an additional sentence that is capable of supporting the measure "Revolutionary." And I found

: "For kings, the world is greatly simplified. All men are subjects. "
Prince
These words are very dangerous for the Bolivarian regime, then suddenly someone realizes that Chavez is the Venezuelan people (and the vast majority of Latin Americans) as the subjects of its expansionist project.

Needless to say, very few like to be subjects, let alone realize that for years, a tyrant has been treated as such.

Fans, subjects: two words that describe the concept that citizens have Chávez. Therefore the unwavering struggle "revolution" to make it vulnerable to the greatest possible number of Venezuelans, for only then, Chavez can keep the fans and subjects that depend on the regime to survive, a lazy parasite.

The decree of exile

Part of the structure of the "revolution" Chavez is supported by the radical change of meaning of words. Last April, Hugo Rafael opened the Revolutionary Plan Reading are looking for, according to the tyrant, "the construction of a new ethic towards education and social culture that promotes humanistic values cultural and framed in the conception of women and men again. "

However, it seems that the new man can not be" contaminated "with material that subverts the chaos it seeks to impose socialism in the XXI century. Furthermore: not broadcast all the Bolivarian thought, version Chávez, has no place in the PRL. Chavez himself has confessed his purposes: "They accuse us that we are ideological society and I say Yes!" "Yes?

Just for ideological reasons, more than 60 thousand volumes have been withdrawn from public libraries in Venezuela, including The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupery, El Quijote, Miguel de Cervantes and The Mystery of the mummy of Albert Hitchcock ... The Little Prince, Sancho and even a mummy will have to look for better air to his words, things are going, soon emulate Chavez and Stalin promulgated a decree that pornography compare with the Bible, punishable with jail who dares Share your content.

By Jaime Restrepo. Director of Atrabilioso.